Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: Paul Jackson <pj@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...>, Derek L. Fults <dfults@...>, devik <devik@...>, Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@...>, Dinakar Guniguntala <dino@...>, Emmanuel Pacaud <emmanuel.pacaud@...>, Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Matthew Dobson <colpatch@...>, Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...>, <rostedt@...>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...>, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...>, Paul Menage <menage@...>, Randy.Dunlap <rddunlap@...>, <suresh.b.siddha@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008 - 7:55 pm

Hi Max,
Hi Peter,

On Tuesday 03 June 2008, Max Krasnyansky wrote:

Oh! Didn't know that user process scheduling is so much 

The initrd is from the distribution. I have no sane way to change it
fast and permanent. Can I change the initrd and still have a certified
RHEL or SLES? Are there initrd hooks, which survive packet installation?

I would really appreciate some way to keep the kernel from using 
a CPU at all to do fault isolation. If possible not even booting it.

Bootparameters survived all distro fiddling so far. I love them!

Try to convince a hardware vendor, that you don't have a software bug.
Try to convince him that you didn't break the hardware by swapping it around.

So I'll ACK removing isolcpus, if we get a better replacement boot option.


Best Regards

Ingo Oeser
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option?..., Michael Trimarchi, (Thu Jun 5, 10:57 am)
Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option?..., Ingo Oeser, (Mon Jun 2, 7:55 pm)