Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@...>
Cc: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008 - 12:59 pm

> Of course if you have to check of the DCD changed, that may not be

Not having to take the cost of that for other users is far more important
than a time variance of a jump prediction. CPU cache effects alone will
add way more variance already. It's not a meaningful number to chase
compared to the randomness introduced by the IRQ handling itself.

If you want perfect accuracy do what I²IT did years ago and use a card
which timestamps the physical IRQ bus transition and exposes it to the OS.

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps &amp; ldisc, Rodolfo Giometti, (Sun Jun 1, 12:15 pm)
Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps &amp; ldisc, Rodolfo Giometti, (Mon Jun 2, 5:25 am)
Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps &amp; ldisc, Rodolfo Giometti, (Mon Jun 2, 10:56 am)
Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps &amp; ldisc, Lennart Sorensen, (Mon Jun 2, 1:09 pm)
Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps & ldisc, Alan Cox, (Mon Jun 2, 12:59 pm)
Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps &amp; ldisc, Rodolfo Giometti, (Mon Jun 2, 1:22 pm)
Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps &amp; ldisc, Matti Aarnio, (Mon Jun 2, 4:21 pm)
Re: LinuxPPS low-level IRQs timestamps &amp; ldisc, Lennart Sorensen, (Sun Jun 1, 3:26 pm)