Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rick van Rein <rick@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008 - 1:02 pm

On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Rick van Rein wrote:


unless there has been a breakthrough that I haven't heard about (always 
possible) I seriously doubt that this is the case.

the alternate technologies that I have heard about are either _far_ less 
dense then DRAM (similar to static ram) or require erasing in blocks 
(similar to flash). niether one is appropriate for a large, flat 
addressed memory architecture as you list below.

David Lang
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Rick van Rein, (Mon Jun 2, 8:59 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Pavel Machek, (Tue Jun 3, 12:12 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jun 2, 4:04 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Rick van Rein, (Mon Jun 2, 5:10 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Andi Kleen, (Mon Jun 2, 8:51 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Stefan Richter, (Tue Jun 3, 10:27 am)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Daniel Barkalow, (Mon Jun 2, 3:30 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, , (Mon Jun 2, 1:02 pm)
Re: Future Linux on Bistable Storage, Jared Hulbert, (Tue Jun 3, 9:14 pm)