Re: m68k libc5 regression

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008 - 3:28 am

On Thu, 29 May 2008, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:


Thanks a lot for verifying, Geert.

So, I assume the proper way to handle this now is you dropping it from 
your m68k tree, and Andrew taking it through -mm.

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
m68k libc5 regression, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Mon May 26, 1:38 pm)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Jiri Kosina, (Mon May 26, 3:19 pm)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Jiri Kosina, (Thu May 29, 4:03 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu May 29, 4:28 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu May 29, 12:38 pm)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Andrew Morton, (Sun Jun 1, 12:53 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sun Jun 1, 1:37 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Andrew Morton, (Sun Jun 1, 1:48 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Jun 1, 2:22 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Andrew Morton, (Sun Jun 1, 2:41 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sun Jun 1, 2:56 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Jun 1, 3:34 am)
Diagnosing linux-next (Was: Re: m68k libc5 regression), Stephen Rothwell, (Sun Jun 1, 6:26 am)
Re: Diagnosing linux-next (Was: Re: m68k libc5 regression), Paul Mackerras, (Sun Jun 1, 10:49 pm)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Jun 2, 3:27 am)
Re: m68k libc5 regression, Jiri Kosina, (Mon Jun 2, 3:28 am)