Re: [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched domains (ie remove cpu_isolated_map)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>
Cc: <maxk@...>, <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <menage@...>, <rostedt@...>
Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 10:39 pm

Peter wrote:

I object to "just" (as in suddenly, without deprecation or prior
warning) removing user space visible kernel features, unless we
have some good reason why we can't take a more methodical approach,
deprecating first.

But I've said that before.

I just started a separate lkml thread, with a wider audience, to
address this question:

  Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)


-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] sched: Give cpusets exclusive control over sched..., Paul Jackson, (Sun Jun 1, 10:39 pm)