Re: 2.6.25.x: Wrong CPU frequency (cpufreq table) with p4-clockmod

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: Guntsche Michael <mike@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 10:36 pm

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

 From my testing, I believe the only thing that p4-clockmod does is forces an 
idle call when it could otherwise do work on an active process, so fullspeed and 
idle uses *EXACTLY* the same amount of power as p4-clockmod slower speed and 
idle (and therefore generates exactly the same amount of heat), the only power 
difference would be that if you were using p4-clockmod to slow down the cpu when 
it had an active running process (force the cpu to be idle a lot of the time 
even though it has work).   Arjan's point is that if you are using  p4-clockmod 
to slow down an idle cpu in hopes of saving power when the cpu is not being 
used, then it is not going to make *ANY* difference in the power usage at all.

I tried it on my p4 here, and cannot see any power difference in idle/fullspeed 
and idle/slowspeed, this is unlike the later power saving stuff that actually 
does slow down the cpu frequency, and you can measure a different amount of 
power usage with the different clock speeds and an idle cpu.

                                    Roger
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: 2.6.25.x: Wrong CPU frequency (cpufreq table) with p4-cl..., Guntsche Michael, (Fri May 30, 10:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25.x: Wrong CPU frequency (cpufreq table) with p4-cl..., Roger Heflin, (Sun Jun 1, 10:36 pm)
Re: 2.6.25.x: Wrong CPU frequency (cpufreq table) with p4-cl..., Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Mon Jun 2, 11:37 am)