On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:14:02PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 20:05 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-06-19 at 18:19 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> 
> > > The sched_entity that belongs to the cfs_rq:
> > > 
> > > >> px *(sched_entity *) 0x759300
> > > struct sched_entity {
> > >         load = struct load_weight {
> > >                 weight = 0x800
> > >                 inv_weight = 0x1ffc01
> > >         }
> > >         run_node = struct rb_node {
> > >                 rb_parent_color = 0x1
> > >                 rb_right = (nil)
> > >                 rb_left = (nil)
> > >         }
> > >         group_node = struct list_head {
> > >                 next = 0x75a3b8
> > >                 prev = 0x75a3b8
> > >         }
> > >         on_rq = 0x1
> > >         exec_start = 0x189685acb4aa46
> > >         sum_exec_runtime = 0x188a2b84c
> > >         vruntime = 0xd036bd29
> > >         prev_sum_exec_runtime = 0x1672e3f62
> > >         last_wakeup = 0x0
> > >         avg_overlap = 0x0
> > >         parent = (nil)
> > >         cfs_rq = 0x75a380
> > >         my_q = 0x759400
> > > }
> 
> Ooh, this thing is with CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED... does it still happen when
> you disable that?

Indeed, when CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED is disabled I cannot reproduce it anymore.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/