Any reason for __set_irq_handler not supporting the IRQ_NOAUTOEN flag?

/Esben

 kernel/irq/chip.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
index 964964b..42bb163 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
@@ -584,10 +584,15 @@ __set_irq_handler(unsigned int irq,
irq_flow_handler_t handle, int is_chained,
 	desc->name = name;

 	if (handle != handle_bad_irq && is_chained) {
-		desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
 		desc->status |= IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE;
-		desc->depth = 0;
-		desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+		if (!(desc->status & IRQ_NOAUTOEN)) {
+			desc->depth = 0;
+			desc->status &= ~IRQ_DISABLED;
+			desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+		} else {
+			/* Undo nested disables: */
+			desc->depth = 1;
+		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 }

-- 
Esben Haabendal, Senior Software Consultant
DoréDevelopment ApS, Ved Stranden 1, 9560 Hadsund, DK-Denmark
Tlf: +45 51 92 53 93, mail: eha@doredevelopment.dk
WWW: http://www.doredevelopment.dk
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/