* Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com> wrote:

quoted text
> From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@sgi.com>
> 
> TLB shootdown for SGI UV.
> 
> This patch brings the code in Ingo's latest (June 18,2008) to v5
> 
> v1: 6/2 original
> v2: 6/3 corrections/improvements per Ingo's review
> v3: 6/4 split atomic operations off to a separate patch (Jeremy's review)
> v4: 6/12 include <mach_apic.h> rather than <asm/mach-bigsmp/mach_apic.h>
>          (fixes a !SMP build problem)
>          fix the index on uv_table_bases[blade]
> v5: 6/18 corrections/improvements per Ingo's second and third reviews
>     (includes closing the security hole in uv_ptc_proc_write())
>     (and adds tlb_uv.o to the Makefile)
> 
> Diffed against 2.6.26-rc6

could you please send a delta patch against tip/x86/uv - or just 
tip/master? You can pick it all up from:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

it's better to have all these delta patches in a consecutive way, as 
everything up to your previous version of v5 has already been tested 
pretty thoroughly on non-UV hardware and is ready to be pushed into 
linux-next.

I'd suggest you name the new delta patch as v6, as there's a "v5" patch 
applied already.

( Also, you might want to check whether tip/master properly works on
  your simulator - to double-check whether the integration of x86/uv 
  changes with other x86 changes went fine. )

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/