On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 04:19:38PM +0200, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Dmitri Vorobiev
> <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi> wrote:
> > Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> >>
> >> -static void fld_const(FPU_REG const *c, int adj, u_char tag)
> >> +static void fld_const(FPU_REG const * c, int adj, u_char tag)
> > ________________________________________^
> >
> > The above does not seem to me like a big improvement in code quality. A
> > false positive from checkpatch.pl?
> 
> Yes, I think you are right.
> Andy CC'ed so that he can have a look at that.

That would be a false positive if we are recommending that.  I have
pushed this fragment in isolation through all versions back to 0.15 and
none of them recommend it.

Ahh, but if I push the whole patch through 0.19 spits it out.  Ok this
is a subtle bug in modifier procesing and is fixed in the head of my
tree.  Will be fixed in the next batch which goes up to -mm.

-apw
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/