Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nick Piggin
Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008 - 1:19 am

On Thursday 19 June 2008 18:12, Peter Zijlstra wrote:


Good suggestions. A trace would be really helpful.

As Arjan suggested, debug options especially CONFIG_DEBUG_VM would be
a good idea to turn on if you haven't already.

BTW. what was the reason for applying those patches? Did you hit the
problem with -mm also, and hope to narrow it down?



Can you isolate it to one of the two groups of patches? I suspect it
might be the latter so you might try that first -- this version of
speculative page references is very nice in theory but it is a little
more complex to implement the slowpaths so it could be an error there.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Jun 18, 2:28 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jun 19, 1:12 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Nick Piggin, (Thu Jun 19, 1:19 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu Jun 19, 5:05 pm)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Peter Zijlstra, (Sun Jun 22, 8:07 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Mon Jun 23, 6:05 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Tue Jun 24, 8:32 am)
Re: [BUG] Lockless patches cause hardlock under heavy IO, Paul E. McKenney, (Tue Jun 24, 9:12 am)