> Which architecture are you interested in? If it isn't x86, you canOh, I mostly think about powerpc, I just wondered if I could re-use your new stuff in that context. Mostly idle thoughts at this stage, I haven't looked seriously. I have an old patch set to batch forks (and mprotect etc...) TLB invalidations (which is what I really want to batch on powerpc, more than the actual PTE changes) that involves subtle changes to the batching mechanisms etc... but it has issues and would need to be reworked before merging. It's something that's been in the back of my mind or the bottom of my TODO list for some time, but I never quite found the bandwidth to go back to it. Cheers, Ben. --
| hooanon05 | [PATCH 67/67] merge aufs |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
| monstr | [PATCH 33/52] [microblaze] bug headers files |
| Oliver Pinter | Re: x86: 4kstacks default |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
