Hi all,
Stats:
$ git diff --shortstat -M stable..

 4276 files changed, 260183 insertions(+), 272182 deletions(-)

$ git rev-list stable.. | wc -l

5031
Changes since next-20080617:
The x86 tree is back.
The s390 tree was fetched OK today.
The input-current tree gained a trivial conflict against Linus' tree.
The nfs tree needed a commit reverted due to build problems.
The net tree lost three conflicts.
The build patch "nfs fix 1" is no longer needed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have created today's linux-next tree at

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sfr/linux-next.git

(patches at

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/).  If you

are tracking the linux-next tree using git, you should not use "git pull"

to do so as that will try to merge the new linux-next release with the

old one.  You should use "git fetch" as mentioned in the FAQ on the wiki

(see below).
You can see which trees have been included by looking in the Next/Trees

file in the source.  There are also quilt-import.log and merge.log files

in the Next directory.  Between each merge, the tree was built with

a ppc64_defconfig for powerpc and an allmodconfig for x86_64. After the

final fixups, it is also built with powerpc allnoconfig,

44x_defconfig and allyesconfig and i386, sparc and sparc64 defconfig.
Below is a summary of the state of the merge.
We are up to 92 trees (counting Linus' and 13 trees of patches pending for

Linus' tree), more are welcome (even if they are currently empty).

Thanks to those who have contributed, and to those who haven't, please do.
Status of my local build tests will be at

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next .  If maintainers want to give

advice about cross compilers/configs that work, we are always open to add

more builds.
Thanks to Jan Dittmer for adding the linux-next tree to his build tests

at http://l4x.org/k/ , the guys at http://test.kernel.org/ and Randy

Dunlap for ...
[ message continues ]

linux-next-20080618/drivers/xen/manage.c: In function 'xen_suspend':

linux-next-20080618/drivers/xen/manage.c:66: error: too few arguments to function 'device_power_up'

linux-next-20080618/drivers/xen/manage.c: In function 'do_suspend':

linux-next-20080618/drivers/xen/manage.c:115: error: too few arguments to function 'device_resume'

make[3]: *** [drivers/xen/manage.o] Error 1
---

~Randy

Linux Plumbers Conference, 17-19 September 2008, Portland, Oregon USA

http://linuxplumbersconf.org/

--

What argument(s) do device_power_up() and device_resume() want now?
    J

--

On Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:08:08 -0700 Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wr=
In today's linux-next:
void device_power_up(pm_message_t state)

void device_resume(pm_message_t state)
If someone can give me a patch, I can carry it in linux-next ...
--=20

Cheers,

Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/