On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:58 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
quoted text > Why not just NULL out the cpu_power function pointers on platforms
> that don't have the feature bit instead? (or the other way around:
> NULL by default, and set only on platforms that have imbalanced
> threads.
Nevermind; bogus optimization. I just noticed that it's only used when
setting up the sched domains, and isn't adding path length later on. :)
-Olof
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] adjust cpu power for secondary threads ... , Olof Johansson , (Wed Jun 18, 8:03 pm)