* Marin Mitov <mitov@issp.bas.bg> wrote:

quoted text
> Why not something like that (do keep in mind I am not an expert :-):
> 
> static void delay_tsc(unsigned long loops)
> {
> 	get and store the mask of allowed cpus;
> 	/*     prevent the migration   */
> 	set the mask of allowed cpus to the current cpu only;
> 	/*     is it possible? could it be guaranteed?    */
> 	loop for the delay;
> 	restore the old mask of allowed cpus;
> }
> 
> You have got the idea. Could it be realized? Is it more expensive than 
> the current realization? So, comments, please.

hm, changing/saving/restorig cpus_allowed is really considered a 'heavy' 
operation compared to preempt_disable(). On a 4096 CPUs box cpus_allowed 
is 4096 bits which is half a kilobyte ...

preempt_disable()/enable() on the other hand only touches a single 
variable, (thread_info->preempt_count which is an u32)

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/