Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, David Miller <davem@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <torvalds@...>, <akpm@...>, <tglx@...>, <linville@...>, <gregkh@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 - 3:17 am

> > It's been something of a double edged sword.  It's great that users are
ask,
il we
 we've
org too,
e "not yet in mainline" pieces
t's perfectly fine, but I'm
ruely is the case then that code surely

That's more a case of Fedora living on the bleeding edge. The code is
fairly stable, all in linux-next, but the churn tends to be high because
of internal API changes that affect all drivers. Currently, I don't
think there is actually any _feature_ pending in linux-next, only
internal cleanups. Such cleanups are desirable, but at the same time can
lead to instability, hence being kept out of .26-git for the time being,
and are in -next for .27. Mostly because we only wrote them after .26
started.

johannes
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Jun 16, 2:24 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Bob Copeland, (Tue Jun 17, 1:18 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jun 17, 5:20 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, David Miller, (Tue Jun 17, 5:26 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jun 17, 11:33 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, David Miller, (Tue Jun 17, 5:51 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jun 18, 8:21 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jun 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Jun 17, 11:34 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Johannes Berg, (Wed Jun 18, 3:17 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Jun 18, 10:22 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, John W. Linville, (Mon Jun 23, 12:55 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Daniel Barkalow, (Tue Jun 17, 2:43 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Daniel Barkalow, (Tue Jun 17, 10:40 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jun 17, 3:31 pm)