> > It's been something of a double edged sword.  It's great that users are
quoted text
> > getting the latest drivers & fixes, but at the same time, it means they
> > get exposed to all the latest breakage at the same time.
> > Given the volume of change occuring, cherry-picking isn't an enviable t=
ask,
quoted text
> > so distros are stuck between this reality, or leaving users hanging unt=
il we
quoted text
> > get to the next point release.
> >=20
> > FWIW, wireless isn't unique in this regard. For eg, the last few months=
 we've
quoted text
> > always been shipping the latest ALSA bits rather than what's in kernel.=
org too,
quoted text
> > for similar reasons -- when bugs appear, the developers want to know
> > "does it still happen with the latest bits?"
> >=20
>=20
>=20
> this is the part that concerns me.  The fact that you feel the need to us=
e "not yet in mainline" pieces
quoted text
> (I'm not so much talking about backporting from 2.6.26-git to 2.6.25; tha=
t's perfectly fine, but I'm
quoted text
> talking about code not in 2.6.26-git) is NOT a healthy sign.... if that t=
ruely is the case then that code surely
quoted text
> deserves to be in mainline as well?

That's more a case of Fedora living on the bleeding edge. The code is
fairly stable, all in linux-next, but the churn tends to be high because
of internal API changes that affect all drivers. Currently, I don't
think there is actually any _feature_ pending in linux-next, only
internal cleanups. Such cleanups are desirable, but at the same time can
lead to instability, hence being kept out of .26-git for the time being,
and are in -next for .27. Mostly because we only wrote them after .26
started.

johannes