From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:33:56 +0200Your point seems to be that, even though we've acknowledged and entirely corrected the problem now, you still will whack us over the head and complain because it took in your opinion too long to get to that point. How nice. That makes the wireless folks feel great I imagine. You also have no idea what infrastructure or other invasive wireless subsystem changes might have been necessary to merge in some of those drivers. Of course, that doesn't suit your goal of making the wireless folks look like a bunch of incompetant twits, so it doesn't surprise me that you haven't investigated any such facts. It is impossible, therefore, to please you since we cannot change the past. So all we can do at this point is continue doing the right thing and completely ignore your pointless whines. In this context your complaints are beyond unfair and beyond pointless, therefore you're finally in my kill file now, have a nice day Ingo. --
| Kok, Auke | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 - ioat/dma engine |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Matthew Garrett | [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
