Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <mingo@...>
Cc: <arjan@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <torvalds@...>, <akpm@...>, <tglx@...>, <linville@...>, <davej@...>, <gregkh@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 - 5:51 pm

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:33:56 +0200


Your point seems to be that, even though we've acknowledged and
entirely corrected the problem now, you still will whack us over the
head and complain because it took in your opinion too long to get to
that point.

How nice.  That makes the wireless folks feel great I imagine.

You also have no idea what infrastructure or other invasive wireless
subsystem changes might have been necessary to merge in some of those
drivers.  Of course, that doesn't suit your goal of making the
wireless folks look like a bunch of incompetant twits, so it doesn't
surprise me that you haven't investigated any such facts.

It is impossible, therefore, to please you since we cannot change the
past.  So all we can do at this point is continue doing the right
thing and completely ignore your pointless whines.

In this context your complaints are beyond unfair and beyond
pointless, therefore you're finally in my kill file now, have a nice
day Ingo.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Jun 16, 2:24 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Bob Copeland, (Tue Jun 17, 1:18 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jun 17, 5:20 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, David Miller, (Tue Jun 17, 5:26 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Jun 17, 11:33 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, David Miller, (Tue Jun 17, 5:51 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jun 18, 8:21 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jun 17, 3:24 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Arjan van de Ven, (Tue Jun 17, 11:34 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Johannes Berg, (Wed Jun 18, 3:17 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Arjan van de Ven, (Wed Jun 18, 10:22 am)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, John W. Linville, (Mon Jun 23, 12:55 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Daniel Barkalow, (Tue Jun 17, 2:43 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Daniel Barkalow, (Tue Jun 17, 10:40 pm)
Re: Oops report for the week preceding June 16th, 2008, Johannes Berg, (Tue Jun 17, 3:31 pm)