Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: fix lockdep warning

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, June 15, 2008 - 7:46 am

On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Daniel J Blueman
<daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:

Ah, yes. Thanks for testing! I thought it might introduce some other
badness. I can't really comment on your new changes (I am not sure
what the implications are exactly), but if it fixes the regression,
then it sounds correct :-)

(I also think this needs Thomas's SOB rather than mine. I am not sure
he's fine with kicking out the retry code :-P)


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] debugobjects: fix lockdep warning, Vegard Nossum, (Sat Jun 14, 6:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: fix lockdep warning, Daniel J Blueman, (Sun Jun 15, 5:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] debugobjects: fix lockdep warning, Vegard Nossum, (Sun Jun 15, 7:46 am)