On Sunday, 15 of June 2008, Vegard Nossum wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.25, please let me know
> > either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
> > entries below are invalid.
> 
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/14/62
> 
> was just reported today. Seems to have been caused by
> 
> commit 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Date:   Wed Apr 30 00:55:01 2008 -0700
> 
>     infrastructure to debug (dynamic) objects
> 
> which was introduced just after v2.6.25, but not discovered until now,
> probably because it requires the (admittedly obscure) combination of
> lockdep and slub/object debugging.

Added to the list as http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10918 .

Thanks,
Rafael
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/