> > In this case there was no real harm from the "this bug is already fixed"
> > condition - just an extra email. Real harm would only come from missed
> > regressions or from incorrectly closed regressions - but those are not
> > happening.
> >
> > note that there is no "robot" involved in changing the state of bugs -
> > the real important work here is done by Rafael and checking whether a
> > bug is still relevant is an inevitably manual work. The mails and
> > reports are auto-generated but crawling discussions and determining the
> > status of a regression is very hard to automate.
>
> Sorry, I thought a robot missed my comments in the bug tracking system for
> the second time:
>
> 1.
> Comment was on 2008-06-06 13:27:16 (
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10864#c3 )
> The mail was coming: 7 Jun 2008 22:42:57 +0200 (CEST) (
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/7/193 )
>
> 2.
> Comment was on 2008-06-13 23:19:53 (
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10864#c4 )
> The mail was coming: 14 Jun 2008 22:12:04 +0200 (CEST) (
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/14/160 )
>
> Nevertheless the bug #10864 can be closed I think.