On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
quoted text
> If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.25, please let me know
> either and I'll add them to the list.  Also, please let me know if any of the
> entries below are invalid.

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/14/62

was just reported today. Seems to have been caused by

commit 3ac7fe5a4aab409bd5674d0b070bce97f9d20872
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date:   Wed Apr 30 00:55:01 2008 -0700

    infrastructure to debug (dynamic) objects

which was introduced just after v2.6.25, but not discovered until now,
probably because it requires the (admittedly obscure) combination of
lockdep and slub/object debugging.


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/