Hi all,

Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
quoted text
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Could you please provide full dmesg and acpidump outputs?
I attached dmesg and config , both from working 2.6.26-rc5 with git-acpi patch 
below and from linux-next snapshot 20080604.
I also attached acpidump that was done while using stock 2.6.25-fw5 from my 
distro. (But I think that doesnt matter, at least it shouldn't ;)

quoted text
> Daniel Exner wrote:
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 19:30:28 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@dragonslave.de> 
wrote:
quoted text
> >>> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>>> (cc linux-acpi)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 11:00:12 +0200 Daniel Exner <dex@dragonslave.de>
> >
> > wrote:
> >>>>> Hi!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (Added myself to CC, because I'm not subscribed)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> with linux-next snapshot 20080604 my Laptop morphes into sitting duck
> >>>>> and I think this is due to this:
> >>>>
> >>>> I assume 2.6.26-rc5 is OK?
> >>>
> >>> Indeed.. just tried it with (nearly) the same config: no unable to
> >>> locate IOAPIC
> >>>
> >>> Will try todays next snapshot above -rc5 now.
> >>
> >> OK, thanks.
> >>
> >> It would be great if you could test 2.6.26-rc5 plus
> >> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/git-acpi.patch.  That'll allow us to
> >> confirm that the regression is due to changes in the acpi tree.
> >
> > Sorry for the delay.. real-life you know ;)
> >
> > I guess you'd expect me to confirm the behavior on rc5 with this patch
> > aplied, but .. well this Kernel works!
To clarify myself:
2.6.25.5:  --> relatively fast no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5:   --> relatively  no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5 + git-acpi Patch:   --> relatively  no IOAPIC Errors in dmesg
2.6.26-rc5 +  linux-next snapshot 20080604 --> even slower than before my ide 
Patch many "unable to locate IOAPIC" Errors


So I think the problem lies not in the acpi tree but somewhre else.

Is it possible to tell git to explicitly _exclude_ a specific tree while 
bisecting?

--
Greetings
Daniel Exner