Hi, I'm a bit confused by configfs module reference counting, and I feel that it does not really protect against module unloading. If my feeling is correct, I'd suggest to change module reference counting rules in configfs, for instance like in the attached patch. If my feeling is wrong, could someone shed some light? Thanks Louis -- Dr Louis Rilling Kerlabs - IRISA Skype: louis.rilling Campus Universitaire de Beaulieu Phone: (+33|0) 2 99 84 71 52 Avenue du General Leclerc Fax: (+33|0) 2 99 84 71 71 35042 Rennes CEDEX - France http://www.kerlabs.com/
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
