Sure, Andrew has an alternate method of including himself the audit
trail: adding a signed-off-by line.
sfr didn't do that, and I certainly am not going to add one on his
behalf (and given email mess, the turnaround would have taken a long
time if I had asked via email).
"always"? There are /plenty/ of occasions, usually at big corps, where
the Author is not the person who wrote the patch, but rather the person
who sent the patch.
And you'll note that all Linus's tools capture that -- author is patch
sender -- albeit with optional From parsing from patch commit description.
My own logic is merely that we should capture the entire audit trail.
You are welcome to pull netdev-2.6.git#davem-silly if you don't think
the existing pull is sufficient, though.
Jeff
--