Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 3:43 pm

David Miller wrote:

Sure, Andrew has an alternate method of including himself the audit 
trail:  adding a signed-off-by line.

sfr didn't do that, and I certainly am not going to add one on his 
behalf (and given email mess, the turnaround would have taken a long 
time if I had asked via email).



"always"?  There are /plenty/ of occasions, usually at big corps, where 
the Author is not the person who wrote the patch, but rather the person 
who sent the patch.

And you'll note that all Linus's tools capture that -- author is patch 
sender -- albeit with optional From parsing from patch commit description.



My own logic is merely that we should capture the entire audit trail.

You are welcome to pull netdev-2.6.git#davem-silly if you don't think 
the existing pull is sufficient, though.

	Jeff


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[git patches] net driver updates for .27, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Jun 11, 7:30 pm)
Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Jun 11, 8:38 pm)
Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27, David Miller, (Wed Jun 11, 9:29 pm)
Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27, Jeff Garzik, (Thu Jun 12, 3:08 pm)
Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27, David Miller, (Thu Jun 12, 3:22 pm)
Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27, Jeff Garzik, (Thu Jun 12, 3:43 pm)
Re: [git patches] net driver updates for .27, David Miller, (Thu Jun 12, 4:14 pm)