David Miller wrote:Did you actually read the commit description? It's quite clear who originated the commit: commit 0c1aa20fb87b796d904f4d89ad12e5a0c483127b Author: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Date: Thu May 29 22:39:28 2008 +1000 [netdrvr] Fix 8390 build breakage From: tony@bakeyournoodle.com (Tony Breeds) ... Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <tony@bakeyournoodle.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com> It's pretty hard to miss, and it accurately captures the entire audit trail: 1) who sent the patch? 2) who wrote the patch? 3) who committed the patch? So, you want to eliminate part of that audit trail (#1), making the commit audit trail more hidden and opaque? I respectfully disagree. We should capture the _entire_ audit trail, not hide bits of it. Full credit is given, as you can see from looking at the commit. Jeff --
| Washington Odhiambo | Weird Problem with NAT - more details |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang |
