RE: [PATCH] HP iLO driver

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Altobelli, David
Date: Thursday, June 12, 2008 - 12:37 pm

H. Peter Anvin wrote:

Yes, that would be more clear.  The code is currently defined to a maximum of 1 hardware device, but this could change, and the dev path should probably reflect that.

How do you feel about /dev/hpiloX/ccbN, where X is 0, 1, ... Num_Devices-1?
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] HP iLO driver, David Altobelli, (Thu Jun 12, 11:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Jun 12, 11:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, Heikki Orsila, (Thu Jun 12, 12:04 pm)
RE: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, Altobelli, David, (Thu Jun 12, 12:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, Marcel Holtmann, (Thu Jun 12, 1:13 pm)
RE: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, Altobelli, David, (Thu Jun 12, 1:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Jun 12, 2:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Jun 12, 2:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, Michael Tokarev, (Fri Jun 13, 1:30 am)
RE: [PATCH] HP iLO driver, Altobelli, David, (Fri Jun 13, 6:54 am)