> I'm not against it. You;v decided that I'm fighting you because I gaveOk, no, I'm not saying you shouldn't rewrite all the code to get rid of it, but I think you can use a patch like mine interim as such a rewrite is unlikely to go into 2.6.26, is it? That would be nice, indeed. :) Yeah, true, that one needs to be done, but it could probably be done only once when hw is probed rather than every time it is brought up. Most likely not something you'll get to fix in 2.6.26 either though. johannes
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Faik Uygur | Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 02/13] syslets: add syslet.h include file, user API/ABI definitions |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: Data corruption issue with splice() on 2.6.27.10 |
| Steven Rostedt | Re: -rt scheduling: wakeup bug? |
