On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:54:18 +1000
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
quoted text > On Thursday 12 June 2008 04:42, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > From: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
> >
> > Christoph Lameter pointed out that ram disk pages also clutter the
> > LRU lists. When vmscan finds them dirty and tries to clean them,
> > the ram disk writeback function just redirties the page so that it
> > goes back onto the active list. Round and round she goes...
quoted text > This isn't the case for brd any longer. It doesn't use the buffer
> cache as its backing store, so the buffer cache is reclaimable.
What does that mean?
I know that pages of files that got paged into the page
cache from the ramdisk can be evicted (back to the ram
disk), but how do the brd pages themselves behave?
--
All Rights Reversed
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH -mm 14/24] Ramfs and Ram Disk pages are unevictable , Rik van Riel , (Thu Jun 12, 10:29 am)