On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:

quoted text
> I really don't understand how your bufctl chains has so many BUFCTL_END 
> elements in the first place. It's doesn't look like the memory has been 
> stomped on (slab->s_mem, for example, is 0xf2906088), so I'd look for a 
> double kfree() of size 128 somewhere...

Looks pretty strange. Could this be rerun with SLAB_DEBUG or with SLUB 
with full debugging?
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/