On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:34:30 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> On a 900MB 2-way, allocate and memset 1000MB.

quoted text
> Seems to have saved a little CPU but the IO patterns got worse.

In previous tests on my 16GB system, a 16GB fillmem (goes into swap)
saves enough CPU time to make up for potentially worse detection of
the working set (well, not like this program really has a working set).

I'll try this out myself on a smaller system and see if there's
something I can do to make it better.
 
quoted text
> qsbench, 4 processes, memory size tuned to threshold-of-swapping*1.1:
> 
> Mainline:
> 
> vmm:/home/akpm/qsbench> time ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230
> ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230  175.45s user 45.67s system 60% cpu 6:08.40 total
> 
> 2.6.26-rc5-mm3:
> 
> vmm:/home/akpm/qsbench> time ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230
> ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230  178.21s user 28.49s system 99% cpu 3:27.14 total
> 
> So woot!  Professional qsbench users will be pleased ;) It could have
> been a fluke though - iirc qsbench is pretty unstable, especially on
> the threshold.

Ignoring references that happen on the active list, only acting
on re-references that happen on the inactive list, gives anonymous
memory something that closer resembles the use-once policy.

Better for some workloads, but potentially worse for others.

Definately worth tweaking the system though, to get performance
as close to where we want it as possible :)

quoted text
> Main thing is: it seems stable.  Old LTP ran for an hour or so before I
> hit the msgctl08 crash (which is a regression in current mainline).

Our main focus has been on stability for the past few months,
trying to get the whole series integrated.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/