Hi Andrew, On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:Looking at the above dump, slabp->free is 0x0f and the bufctl it points to is 0xff ("BUFCTL_END") which marks the last element in the chain. This is wrong as the total number of objects in the slab (cachep->num) is 26 but the number of objects in use (slabp->inuse) is 20. So somehow you have managed to lost 6 objects from the bufctl chain. I really don't understand how your bufctl chains has so many BUFCTL_END elements in the first place. It's doesn't look like the memory has been stomped on (slab->s_mem, for example, is 0xf2906088), so I'd look for a double kfree() of size 128 somewhere... Pekka --
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [2.6.22.2 review 05/84] Fix deadlocks in sparc serial console. |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Jeff Kirsher | [RESEND][NET-NEXT PATCH 01/29] ixgbe: fix bug where using wake queue instead of st... |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Manuel Bouyer | Re: Interactive performance in -current |
| Christian Limpach | Re: newfs: determining file system parameters |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | Re: statvfs(2) replacement for statfs(2) patch |
| Charles M. Hannum | Re: kern/22869: Slave IDE drive not detected |
