On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:42:14 -0400 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:Hey, I did some MM testing! On a 900MB 2-way, allocate and memset 1000MB. mainline: vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.10s user 10.27s system 62% cpu 16.567 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.12s user 10.23s system 63% cpu 16.234 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.13s user 9.90s system 63% cpu 15.812 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.11s user 9.98s system 65% cpu 15.494 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.12s user 9.94s system 62% cpu 16.000 total 2.6.26-rc5-mm3: vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.15s user 9.81s system 52% cpu 19.117 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.14s user 9.07s system 45% cpu 20.403 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.25s user 9.63s system 34% cpu 28.533 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.15s user 9.35s system 49% cpu 19.196 total vmm:/home/akpm> time usemem -m 1000 usemem -m 1000 0.13s user 8.79s system 49% cpu 17.993 total Seems to have saved a little CPU but the IO patterns got worse. qsbench, 4 processes, memory size tuned to threshold-of-swapping*1.1: Mainline: vmm:/home/akpm/qsbench> time ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230 ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230 175.45s user 45.67s system 60% cpu 6:08.40 total 2.6.26-rc5-mm3: vmm:/home/akpm/qsbench> time ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230 ./qsbench -p 4 -m 230 178.21s user 28.49s system 99% cpu 3:27.14 total So woot! Professional qsbench users will be pleased ;) It could have been a fluke though - iirc qsbench is pretty unstable, especially on the threshold. Main thing is: it seems stable. Old LTP ran for an hour or so before I hit the msgctl08 crash (which is a regression in current mainline). --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
