Re: ldp/staging/driver-core (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 11)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Greg KH
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 5:17 pm

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:05:20AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

Yes, but if there are only 1 or 2 patches that are ready to go upstream
in -next, and you are pulling the whole -staging tree in, it doesn't
make much sense to keep the two separate, so I just put them at the top
of the staging tree.


Thanks.


That's exactly what we are going to do.  I removed them from my tree for
now to prevent these kinds of merge errors.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for June 11, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Jun 11, 2:38 am)
[BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 11 - on ia64, Kamalesh Babulal, (Wed Jun 11, 7:32 am)
Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 11 - on ia64, Kamalesh Babulal, (Wed Jun 11, 9:46 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for June 11, Greg KH, (Wed Jun 11, 11:55 am)
Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 11 - on ia64, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Jun 11, 4:10 pm)
Re: [BUILD-FAILURE] linux-next: Tree for June 11 - on ia64, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Jun 11, 4:14 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for June 11, Kevin Winchester, (Wed Jun 11, 5:17 pm)
Re: ldp/staging/driver-core (Was: Re: linux-next: Tree for ..., Greg KH, (Wed Jun 11, 5:17 pm)