Greg KH wrote:We're jumping the guns here a bit, but ... The code is pretty stable and robust as far as the protocol and performance is concerned, surly once I in-tree them, divide them into patches, prettify comments, add file-headers, and checkpatch them. But the bigger implications are not yet clear, and will need advise from the list, which could take time. Mainly in regard to upper ULD and tests. Currently there are 4 users for this code: - pNFS-over-objects layout driver - pNFS-over-objects Simple Server implementation (spNFS) - OSDVFS - Virtual psuedo file system to access and debug OSD luns from user mode. (This is not the OSDFS from IBM which is a general FS over objects, but a direct representation of the OSD Lun to user mode) - Testing The first 3 are their own ULD and do not need a proper SCSI-ULD. With some changes to sg.c they can manage with what we have now. The later is just for debugging. On the other hand a true OSD-ULD that exports /dev/osdx char and/or block devices, has merits and future directions of it's own. And will eliminate the need for changes in sg.c So the mechanics are pretty much there but the direction is not clear, which will govern the folders/exports/dependencies. But I'm not sure -staging tree will help in any of that. I do have my git.open-osd.org exports and can manage all that there. It could help in exposure and testing of the code. Thanks Boaz --
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Geert Uytterhoeven | Re: linux-next: Tree for August 14 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
