Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in pat_init()

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@...>
Cc: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...>, Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 1:35 pm

Andreas Herrmann wrote:

Arg, sorry, I read the code brokenly.  You're right, of course.


Yes, those all have PAT enabled.


Yes, that would be a suitable course of action; moving it to 
Intel-specific code.  Then the Intel people can worry about lifting the 
remaining blacklisted CPUs.

	-hpa

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in pat_in..., Andreas Herrmann, (Tue Jun 10, 10:05 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in pa..., Andreas Herrmann, (Wed Jun 11, 12:12 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86: PAT: fix ambiguous paranoia check in pa..., H. Peter Anvin, (Wed Jun 11, 1:35 pm)
[PATCH] x86: enable PAT on (almost) all CPUs that advertise it, Andreas Herrmann, (Wed Jun 11, 11:05 am)