Re: [S] Re: [linux-uwb] packet size problem

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>
Cc: AntonioLin <antonio.lin@...>, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...>, USB list <linux-usb@...>, Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 - 11:16 am

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Jens Axboe wrote:


Well then, put it this way: We don't care particularly about the
address alignment as such, but we do need the buffer length to be a
multiple of 1024 for all but the last element in the SG list.  Is there
a better way to accomplish this?


Both.

Alan Stern

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [S] Re: [linux-uwb] packet size problem, Alan Stern, (Wed Jun 11, 10:39 am)
Re: [S] Re: [linux-uwb] packet size problem, Jens Axboe, (Wed Jun 11, 10:53 am)
Re: [S] Re: [linux-uwb] packet size problem, Alan Stern, (Thu Jun 12, 5:14 pm)
Re: [S] Re: [linux-uwb] packet size problem, Alan Stern, (Wed Jun 11, 11:16 am)