On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 15:32 -0700, David Miller wrote:

quoted text
> If we cannot find a simple and easy way to deal with this locking
> problem, I am reverting the defer-accept changes entirely.  It's not
> the end of the world if this feature has to be deferred to 2.6.27

based on this, plus the comments from vitaliy it is clear that moving
the DA socket to established is pretty tricky. I agree I should address
these things in the >= 27 time frame.

imho we don't need to revert the first two patches:
e4c78840284f3f51b1896cf3936d60a6033c4d2c and
539fae89bebd16ebeafd57a87169bc56eb530d76 .. they have nothing to do with
rearranging states or the locking and they do fix the more notable DA
behavior issues.

-Patrick

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/