Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...>, Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...>
No, it's correct. This is to be read as "The PAT feature is enabled in
the kernel but the CPU claims to not have PAT". The message is not a
leftover from the old flag-clearing setup or anything; it was introduced
in the patch that disabled that.
Which is okay-ish, or at least by design it seems. The paranoia check in
pat.c will catch this case.
The current setup is okay really. The only thing it still wants is a
commandline whitelist switch but that needs a somewhat different setup
as validate_pat_support() is too early for __setup() or early_param().
Rene.
--