On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 08:51:10 +0200
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> wrote:

Hi, Jean!
 
quoted text
> > I'd say yes, they do. zoran_card.c contain lists detailing chips, and those
> > are available for reference at bus creation time. Would you know of any
> > driver I can look at to see how this new style stuff works? The "new style"
> > i2c things I've encountered so far is the 2.6 i2c subsystem as used when 2.4
> > style drivers are converted with a minimum amount of work involved.
> 
> "New-style" i2c drivers are drivers which follow the device driver
> model and do not create their own devices (i2c_client). As opposed to
> "legacy" i2c drivers in 2.4 kernels and early 2.6 kernels (and still a
> lot of drivers in the current 2.6 kernel) which create their own
> i2c_client.

That explains things. Good, then that should be the route to take.

quoted text
> Ben wrote a guide about converting legacy drivers to new-style drivers:
>   http://marc.info/?l=i2c&m=121250094017709&w=2

Excellent, it looks simple enough.

quoted text
> If you want to go that route for the zoran driver, you'll have to
> convert some of the chip drivers (at least bt866 and saa7185 if they
> are the ones causing trouble), and also modify the main zoran driver to
> create these devices (using i2c_new_device or i2c_new_probed_device) and
> remove them (using i2c_unregister_device) as needed.

bt866 belongs to the avs6eyes part of the zoran driver, while saa7185 belongs to the buz one.

quoted text
> One problem may be if some of the chip drivers are shared with other
> V4L adapters (apparently the bt866 driver is zoran-only, but I'm not
> sure about the saa7185 driver). In that case you can't just convert
> them to new-style, or you would break the other adapters which expect
> the legacy drivers. So you'd have to make hybrid chip drivers, keeping
> the legacy driver (for other adapters) and adding a new-style driver
> (for zoran.)
> 
> In that case, you probably want to look at what Hans Verkuil did for
> the ivtv and cx18 adapters, and maybe talk to him. He wrote helper
> wrappers to write such hybrid chip drivers easily.

That sounds good, too. Breaking other people's drivers isn't nice.

quoted text
> Note that I have a DC10+ somewhere in a drawer, so if you're going to
> convert the zoran drivers to the new-style model, I can help you with
> testing. And if you have questions in the process, feel free to ask.
> I'll be happy to review your patches.

Very good indeed. I'd work on some other chips, too, but there should be people that can test those not on the DC10+.

quoted text
> P.S.: I don't know how much energy you are going to put in the zoran
> driver, but I have a number of patches for it, which never made it
> upstream, if you're interested.

I'm not going to commit myself to it full time. Not even half time or anything resembling that, because I seldom get away from life long enough for serious hacking. Zoran improvements are good, though, and if you don't have the time to commit them, I might do.

Regards,
/Sam
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/