Re: on static kobjects and double frees...

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arthur Jones <ajones@...>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel@...>, Doug Thompson <norsk5@...>, bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <bluesmoke-devel@...>
Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 12:42 pm

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 09:38:00AM -0700, Arthur Jones wrote:

Hm, there is the following text in that file:
	Because kobjects are dynamic, they must not be declared
	statically or on the stack, but instead, always allocated
	dynamically.  Future versions of the kernel will contain a
	run-time check for kobjects that are created statically and will
	warn the developer of this improper usage.


Great, if you want me to review it, I'd be glad to do so.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
on static kobjects and double frees..., Arthur Jones, (Tue Jun 10, 11:58 am)
Re: on static kobjects and double frees..., Greg KH, (Tue Jun 10, 12:23 pm)
Re: on static kobjects and double frees..., Arthur Jones, (Tue Jun 10, 12:38 pm)
Re: on static kobjects and double frees..., Doug Thompson, (Tue Jun 10, 5:14 pm)
Re: on static kobjects and double frees..., Arthur Jones, (Tue Jun 10, 5:39 pm)
Re: on static kobjects and double frees..., Greg KH, (Tue Jun 10, 12:42 pm)
Re: on static kobjects and double frees..., Arthur Jones, (Tue Jun 10, 12:58 pm)