Re: Limits of the 965 chipset & 3 PCI-e cards/southbridge? ~774MiB/s peak for read, ~650MiB/s peak for write?

Previous thread: pppd and 2.6.25 serial driver by Chris Vine on Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 4:56 pm. (5 messages)

Next thread: Re: [drm:radeon_cp_idle] *ERROR* radeon_cp_idle called without lock held by Dave Airlie on Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 6:11 pm. (2 messages)
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 5:23 pm

Nice test. The Seagate 7200.11 drives deliver 120MB/s (outer zone,
raw) each, and there is an issue with CFQ dispatching requests; see:

http://groups.google.co.uk/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/b8826...

A quick workaround tweak is:

# echo 0 >/sys/block/sda/queue/iosched/slice_idle

Does this help any? This gives the difference of ~68MB/s vs ~120MB/s
on my 7200.11 ;-) .

That said, the i965 chipset is fairly contemporary, but if that 2GB/s
DMI connection is the bidirectional bandwidth (likely), then maybe
you're hitting that limit: Intel's DMI bus is based on PCIe, thus will
use 128 byte PCI-e Max Payload packets (as in the rest of the
chipset), which IIRC theoretically maxes you out near 800MB/s.

The X48 chipset may allow you to crank the Max Payload to 256 (setpci
and the Intel chipset docs), if it doesn't default to 256, like in
5400 server chipsets. This chipset is where the fun really starts eg
hdparm -T giving >10GB/s, like in Itanium2s ;-) .

Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--

To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 7:43 pm

slice 0 does help a little with my 10-disk raid5 for sequential
read/writes:

http://home.comcast.net/~jpiszcz/raid/20080601/raid5.html
--

To: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 5:26 pm

Unfortunately the disks have been removed from the host, only to test
Very interesting, do you know what AMD uses for their boards by any chance?
I'll most likely stick with some type of Intel chipset but was curious
--

Previous thread: pppd and 2.6.25 serial driver by Chris Vine on Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 4:56 pm. (5 messages)

Next thread: Re: [drm:radeon_cp_idle] *ERROR* radeon_cp_idle called without lock held by Dave Airlie on Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 6:11 pm. (2 messages)