[PATCH 0/3] s/PF_BORROWED_MM/PF_KTHREAD/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Sunday, June 1, 2008 - 8:30 am

The first 2 patches were silently ignored, resend. I don't really understand
who should be cc'ed on this.

The third one is an example. Obviously we can fix the problem without changing
use_mm/PF_BORROWED_MM, but in that case we must do task_lock/unlock for each
process in the system, not good and annoying.

Oleg.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/3] s/PF_BORROWED_MM/PF_KTHREAD/, Oleg Nesterov, (Sun Jun 1, 8:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] s/PF_BORROWED_MM/PF_KTHREAD/, Roland McGrath, (Tue Jun 3, 2:55 pm)