> > $ git checkout -b rc v2.6.26-rc1 > > $ git bisect start > > $ git bisect bad > > $ git bisect good v2.6.25 > > > > Yet, during this I'm finding myself at 2.6.25-rc6 and 2.6.25-rc8 > > as the last two results (both good...). > I reported a similar thing at the beginning of April > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/2/390 - 2.6.25-rc1 bad, 2.6.24 good, git > dropped me back at 2.6.24-rc4 (again, according to the top level > Makefile). This is normal and expected, due to the distributed nature of git and the fact that git-bisect operates on the full topology of history and not just a linear sequence of commits. Imagine history like: A---B---C---D \ / \ / \ / E---F where B is good and D is bad. Now, when you bisect, there is no way to know whether, say, E is good or bad and hence the bisect process may present E as a tree to try. Now, if B is the 2.6.25 release, then since E branched off before B, it will have a Makefile that says 2.6.25-rcX. Which is exactly the behavior you are seeing. In short, everything looks fine and is behaving as expected. - R. --
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| Adrian Bunk | 2.6.23-rc4-mm1: mips compile error |
| Nick Piggin | Re: [PATCH 0 of 4] Generic AIO by scheduling stacks |
git: | |
| Bill Lear | Dangers of working on a tracking branch |
| Pedro Melo | Re: git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [Census] So who uses git? |
| Leon Dippenaar | New tcp stack attack |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Chris | sudo & wheel group |
| Paul Moore | [PATCH v7 00/17] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 |
| Wang Chen | [PATCH 2/15] netdevice 82596: Convert directly reference of netdev->priv to net... |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Herbert Xu | Re: csum offload and af_packet |
