On Fri, 9 May 2008, Rene Herman wrote:This is very normal. Why? Because a lot (in fact, *most*) of the code that was merged after v2.6.25 was released was actually *written* and committed long before v2.6.25. It just got merged into my tree much later. So what happens? The bisection run starts walking into all that history, and that history is *not* based on the released v2.6.25 at all, it's based on much earlier kernels (eg the -rc kernels). So what you see is perfectly normal and expected. It's only unexpected if you think of history as a linear thing, but it isn't - it's full of merging of code that was branched off from (much) earlier code points. Linus --
| Christoph Lameter | [04/14] vcompound: Core piece |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Andrew Morton | Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1 |
git: | |
| Ken Pratt | pack operation is thrashing my server |
| Kyle Moffett | Using GIT to store /etc (Or: How to make GIT store all file permission bits) |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts |
| Toby White | Using Filemerge.app as a git-diff viewer |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Peter | OpenBSD as Virtualbox guest |
| Richard Daemon | OpenBSD 4.3 running in VirtualBox? Anyone have it working properly? |
| Mark Zimmerman | alix 2c3 bios version |
| Christoph Hellwig | Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 |
| Al Boldi | Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck |
| Theodore Tso | Re: [RFC 0/13] extents and 48bit ext3 |
| Josef Jeff Sipek | [PATCH 22 of 23] Unionfs: Unlink |
