On Wed, 7 May 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text > and you're now done. You have your "mm_lock()" (which still needs to be
> renamed - it should be a "mmu_notifier_lock()" or something like that),
> but you don't need the insane sorting. At most you apparently need a way
> to recognize duplicates (so that you don't deadlock on yourself), which
> looks like a simple bit-per-vma.
Andrea's mm_lock could have wider impact. It is the first effective
way that I have seen of temporarily holding off reclaim from an address
space. It sure is a brute force approach.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 08 of 11] anon-vma-rwsem , Christoph Lameter , (Wed May 7, 9:12 pm)