On Thu, 8 May 2008, Rene Herman wrote:Umm, and this is different how from clearing the PSE bit when we decide not to use large-page support? See arch/x86/kernel/setup_32.c: parse_mem() for an example. Rene - you have valid points (ie that patches were NAK'ed etc and you might have wanted better changelog entries), but trust me, this one is not one of them. /proc/cpuinfo and the kernel clearing feature bits is _normal_. It's how it has always been. Linus --
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [BUG] long freezes on thinkpad t60 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted |
| Jamie Lokier | Proposal for "proper" durable fsync() and fdatasync() |
| jimmy bahuleyan | Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3? |
git: | |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Matt Mackall | Re: cleaner/better zlib sources? |
| Wink Saville | git-svn segmetation fault |
| Bill Lear | Meaning of "fatal: protocol error: bad line length character"? |
| Florin Andrei | firewall is very slow, something's wrong |
| Wijnand Wiersma | Almost success: OpenBSD on Xen |
| Marcus Andree | Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Miller | Re: tcp bw in 2.6 |
| Rick Jones | Re: 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X |
| Patrick McHardy | [NET_SCHED 00/04]: External SFQ classifiers/flow classifier |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode |
