On Thu, 8 May 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:The order of the signed-offs are somewhat relevant, but no, sign-offs don't mean authorship. See the rules for sign-off: you can sign off on another persons patches, even if they didn't sign off on them themselves. That's clause (b) in particular. So yes, quite often you'd _expect_ the first sign-off to match the author, but that's a correlation, not a causal relationship. Linus --
| Andrea Arcangeli | [PATCH 06 of 11] rwsem contended |
| Mikulas Patocka | LFENCE instruction (was: [rfc][patch 3/3] x86: optimise barriers) |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted |
| Manu Abraham | PCIE |
git: | |
| Sverre Rabbelier | Git vs Monotone |
| Junio C Hamano | [ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.4 |
| Bill Lear | Meaning of "fatal: protocol error: bad line length character"? |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: [PATCH] Teach remote machinery about remotes.default config variable |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Stefan Beke | mail dovecot: pipe() failed: Too many open files |
| Wijnand Wiersma | Almost success: OpenBSD on Xen |
| Didier Wiroth | how can I "find xyz | xargs tar" ... like gtar |
| Greg A. Woods | Re: Fork bomb protection patch |
| Tyler Retzlaff | Re: more summer of code fun |
| Elad Efrat | Re: sysctl knob to let sugid processes dump core (pr 15994) |
| Thor Lancelot Simon | Re: FFS journal |
