Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-arch@...>, <jeremy@...>, <mingo@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 7, 2008 - 4:42 pm

On Mon, May 05 2008, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

Sorry for the delayed response here. The below looks pretty good to me,
though it'll require a few modifications to fixup smp_call_function()
from irq disabled context.

But that's doable, though I have to do a grep over the kernel to check
everything (I remember CPU send_stop being one such path). Not a huge
fan of such an interface, but hey...

Is everyone OK with going this route, initially at least? It's the
lesser of all evils, I think.


This part puzzled me, why? We default to 'n' and let converted archs
opt-in, so I don't get this part of your patch...

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function c..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Apr 30, 6:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function c..., Jens Axboe, (Wed May 7, 4:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function c..., Paul E. McKenney, (Wed Apr 30, 10:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Apr 30, 5:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Apr 29, 4:35 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/10] x86: convert to generic helpers for IPI fun..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Apr 30, 10:51 am)