On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:As far as I can tell, authorship has been destroyed by at least two of the patches (ie Christoph seems to be the author, but Andrea seems to have dropped that fact). Yeah, too late and no upside. That "locking" code is also too ugly to live, at least without some serious arguments for why it has to be done that way. Sorting the locks? In a vmalloc'ed area? And calling this something innocuous like "mm_lock()"? Hell no. That code needs some serious re-thinking. Linus --
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [BUG] long freezes on thinkpad t60 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: [Bug 10030] Suspend doesn't work when SD card is inserted |
| Jamie Lokier | Proposal for "proper" durable fsync() and fdatasync() |
| jimmy bahuleyan | Re: how about mutual compatibility between Linux's GPLv2 and GPLv3? |
git: | |
| Martin Langhoff | Handling large files with GIT |
| Matt Mackall | Re: cleaner/better zlib sources? |
| Wink Saville | git-svn segmetation fault |
| Bill Lear | Meaning of "fatal: protocol error: bad line length character"? |
| Florin Andrei | firewall is very slow, something's wrong |
| Wijnand Wiersma | Almost success: OpenBSD on Xen |
| Marcus Andree | Re: OpenBSD kernel janitors |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| David Miller | Re: tcp bw in 2.6 |
| Rick Jones | Re: 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X |
| Patrick McHardy | [NET_SCHED 00/04]: External SFQ classifiers/flow classifier |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode |
