On Wed, 7 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text
> 
> [ this patch should in fact be a bit worse, because there's two more 
>   atomics in the fastpath - the fastpath atomics of the old semaphore 
>   code. ]

Well, it doesn't have the irq stuff, which is also pretty costly. Also, it 
doesn't nest the accesses the same way (with the counts being *inside* the 
spinlock and serialized against each other), so I'm not 100% sure you'd 
get the same behaviour.

But yes, it certainly has the potential to show the same slowdown. But 
it's not a very good patch, since not showing it doesn't really prove 
much.

			Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/